(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-16 08:45 am (UTC)
Nice post. :)

I have a minor quibble with Lord Rees' stance - physics isn't about "simple" things, but rather physicists do their work by deliberately simplifying them in a way that isn't always possible with Biology.

For example, determining orbits of the planets and their moons in our Solar System is astonishingly complex if you want to take into account the truly accurate gravitational interactions between all the bodies involved (see the N-body problem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-body_problem) and N-body simulation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-body_simulation) on wikipedia if you're interested) but because of the nature of the system we can simplify it by simply ignoring the smaller interactions - it's not entirely accurate when we do this, but it's a close enough approximation for what we need.

Biologists do the same thing in some situations (such as modeling large populations) but the technique is less generally applicable.

Btw: 10-20 has just 19 zeros after the decimal point >;-)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

the cosmolinguist

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 45 6 7
8910 11 1213 14
15 16 17 1819 20 21
22232425 26 27 28
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags