I'm watching an old episode of QI and Stephen Fry has just described the Turing test as "the most important thing for a machine," in the context of advancement in robots and computers and that sort of thing.
And I just thought, man, what a human-centered way to think about it! It's probably not the most important thing to a machine at all, because why would a machine care about how well it can simulate a boring rubbish fallible weird old human? It's an important thing for humans in the machines they're building, maybe, but not for the machine, right?
But then I thought, in order to pass the Turing test, it'd have to care about passing the Turing test because that's what humans care about.
And I kept thinking about this and my brain got all tangled up.
And I just thought, man, what a human-centered way to think about it! It's probably not the most important thing to a machine at all, because why would a machine care about how well it can simulate a boring rubbish fallible weird old human? It's an important thing for humans in the machines they're building, maybe, but not for the machine, right?
But then I thought, in order to pass the Turing test, it'd have to care about passing the Turing test because that's what humans care about.
And I kept thinking about this and my brain got all tangled up.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-25 08:28 am (UTC)Heja, robots!(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-25 09:54 am (UTC)This and the fact that Turing Machines are so different from the computers I recognised meant that it took me a long time to realise how important his work actually was.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-27 11:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-27 11:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-27 11:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-27 12:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-24 09:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-26 06:01 pm (UTC)I err on the side of no.