iRant

Oct. 6th, 2011 09:56 am
[personal profile] cosmolinguist
The way Steve Jobs is being eulogized around Twitter and Facebook bothers me.

He died young, and pancreatic cancer is an awful thing*. The personal tragedy for the people who knew him is foremost in my mind.

But beyond that, the image of him as the geek messiah is worryingly pervasive. As Andrew said, people are talking as if he made every iPhone by hand out of minerals he mined from the ground.

Let's not forget how those iPhones are actually made:
Foxconn routinely forces it workers to work two to three times the legal Chinese limit and to work in brutal and often unsafe conditions that have led to many accidents... These working conditions led to 10 Foxconn worker suicides at the company's Shenzhen facility in 2010 alone. The suicide problem at Foxconn’s Chinese factories became so bad that the company put up steel wire to prevent workers from jumping and killing themselves.

And as Jobs was speaking in San Francisco [while announcing the iPhone], new measures were being secretly introduced at Foxconn to prevent the suicide scandal from worsening and damaging Apple sales globally.

Astonishingly, this involves forcing all Foxconn employees to sign a new legally binding document promising that they won't kill themselves.
And more than that, Apple are actively trying to keep you from finding out the less savory side of your shiny phone.
Phone Story is intended to serve as a reminder for users of the impact, though indirectly accusing Apple of human rights violation via dangerous extraction of coltan, a mineral used in manufacturing of consumer electronics products, worker abuse under questionable conditions at companies such as Foxconn, and launching new products every year thus creating more e-waste. Apple has thus ban[ned] the app citing reasons including the depiction of violence or abuse against children and excessively objectionable or crude content.
Content not suitable for games, apparently, but perfectly all right in real life.

And of course not all this is entirely Steve Jobs' doing either; the Phone Story game is new and its ban was not while he was CEO. Not everything is his fault (though some things, like ending Apple's corporate philanthropy to save costs, are).

But this is part of the point. As CEO he might have been good at taking the credit, doing the flashy rock-star presentations Maybe he inspired you or maybe he just convinced you to give him your money. But he did not make your MacBook and he did not make Toy Story.

I am having a massive sense of humor fail about this. And it's not just because I hate Macs, even though I do. Apple products go against everything I hold dear about computers, like the right to change and improve my own possessions, use my media and data however I like, casting off the oppression of DRM, and still having some money left in the world after buying an mp3 player.

Then there's this quote of his I saw on someone's Facebook, and also heard on the radio as I was making my pancakes this morning...
Your work is going to fill a large part of your life, and the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven't found it yet, keep looking. Don't settle. As with all matters of the heart, you'll know when you find it. And, like any great relationship, it just gets better and better as the years roll on. So keep looking. Don't settle.
To which I can only say OH DO F*** OFF!

"Don't settle" isn't a choice everybody has. My dad has been doing manual labor all his life, despite being clever, fun and witty as anyone on NPR being earnestly middle-class. My mom worked an incredibly stressful and draining job helping an autistic boy through school, for less than you make working at McDonald's. Andrew has a day job he loathes, because he can't afford to do what he wants (yet!) and considers it a higher priority in the meantime to support us than to be a visionary who gives inspiring speeches for a fee that would probably see us through a whole year.

Those poor bastards making the iPhones in China; do you think this is how they wanted their lives to be? Aren't they settling just to bring us your greatest new toys, Steve? A lot of people have to settle. A lot of people have to do work they don't like. What does he have to say to them? A lot of people have families to support, discrimination to face, barriers to getting jobs, or getting good ones...and just bad luck. Some of us have to have higher priorities than waking up every morning knowing we are doing nothing but good work that we love.

I'm not saying "don't try" -- obviously it's great if you can do good work that you love -- but don't be too hard on yourself if you can't. And don't insult the intelligence and personhood of someone who works in a factory or is a teaching assistant or whatever, just because compared to iSteve their life is less sexy and flashy and newsworthy. Or because they can't afford an iPod.

* Edit: As pointed out in comments: Most pancreatic cancers are aggressive and always terminal, but Steve was lucky (if you can call it that) and had a rare form called an islet cell neuroendocrine tumor, which is actually quite treatable with excellent survival rates — if caught soon enough. The median survival is about a decade, but it depends on how soon it’s removed surgically. Steve caught his very early, and should have expected to survive much longer than a decade. Unfortunately Steve relied on a naturopathic diet instead of early surgery. There is no evidence that diet has any effect on islet cell carcinoma. I find it a little more complicated to be sympathetic now, but it's still sad people keep falling for this hippie shit.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 10:38 am (UTC)
barakta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] barakta
And he may not have needed to die quite so young as it seems he didn't actually use proper medicine to treat it for ages: http://skeptoid.com/blog/2011/10/05/a-lesson-in-treating-illness/

That isn't about blaming him for the outcome or knowing for sure, but it says something about using hippy crap and not getting good care cos of it and how pervasive and dangerous things like that can be - and how many people might have copied him?

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] barakta - Date: 2011-10-06 10:58 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 01:06 pm (UTC)
ext_51145: (Default)
From: [identity profile] andrewhickey.info
Except that the stuff linked by that blog doesn't actually say what the blog says it does. It says he tried 'various alternative therapies' in the nine months before surgery, without saying what those alternative therapies were (they could actually have been effective - some are) or why he waited nine months (possibly not through choice - it's entirely possible he had to be in better shape than he was for surgery or something, in which case trying something else while he waited, even if it *was* ineffective, would make perfect sense). It also does say he changed his diet - *after having his pancreas removed*. Which seems reasonable to me.

And the thing about median survival times is that by definition half the people don't survive that long...

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 11:10 am (UTC)
chiller: (Default)
From: [personal profile] chiller
Thank you for writing this. I found you when a friend linked this entry on twitter. I've watched the eulogies roll in all day, and nobody has summed up what I was thinking until I read this (hope you don't mind if I add you).

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] chiller - Date: 2011-10-06 11:31 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] chiller - Date: 2011-10-06 11:42 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] chiller - Date: 2011-10-06 12:25 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 12:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fabulousblueporcupine.wordpress.com
It was the "don't settle, stay hungry" bollocks being touted around like the wisdom of the gods that really got to me. All very well to "stay hungry" until you actually get, you know, hungry.

It's not just Jobs either, all sorts of great-and-goods get paid for giving variants of this advice in various contexts (including plenty of broadsheet careers pages) and it just winds me up. They honestly seem to think there's a cause-and-effect relationship between "I stayed hungry/didn't settle/worked hard/followed my dreams" and "I enjoyed huge success". All the millions of tiny circumstances beyond their influence, all the little switches that had to be flipped the right way, even the macro-economic circumstances of their birth and young adulthood, for heaven's sake - it all gets absorbed into the post-factum narrative in which *their* actions were the critical factor. I really do think this is a corrosive creed - a slightly more sophisticated version of the idea that going on reality TV will make you rich and famous.

It never seems to occur to people like this that there might be millions of others for whom these exact same techniques did not work at all. It's partly a failure of imagination, but I guess partly they never have it brought to their attention because (shocker) nobody ever asks those other people to give presentations on why their life didn't entirely work out the way they wanted.

I suppose he was addressing a roomful of Stanford graduates, however, and the chances are not many of them will be forced by circumstances to settle, so in that sense it was a well-pitched speech.

Sorry for piggybacking my rant on your rant.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 01:02 pm (UTC)
ext_51145: (Default)
From: [identity profile] andrewhickey.info
This is exactly what I was trying to say in my Doctor Who post yesterday, actually...

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fabulousblueporcupine.wordpress.com - Date: 2011-10-06 03:07 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] andrewhickey.info - Date: 2011-10-06 03:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] intellectualdwarf.wordpress.com
The Foxconn suicide story is compelling, but only if you don't consider that estimates for the annual suicide rate in China vary between 13-30 per 100,000 people, and Foxconn employs 300,000 people in Shenzhen. That means that suicides of 40-90 people per year would be 'normal', although also deeply troubling. The extra counseling and suicide prevention at Foxconn only came about because of the pressure that resulted from the connection to Apple; if the resulting suicide prevention efforts kept employee suicide rates down to less than 40 per year, that would be better than the average. God, this sounds incredibly callous to write, but I suppose it's no worse than being fact-based when considering the survival rates associated with different cancer treatments.

As for the "he didn't build the iPhones himself" argument, that's obviously true as a statement. As a metaphor for Apple though, I'm not sure that it works. Jobs co-founded the company, and it was successful during his first time there, and floundered after he left. Apple was a spent force in 1997 when he returned, and since that point has undergone a dramatic recovery. The only variable there was Steve Jobs as CEO. Gil Amelio practically ran the company into the ground, going so far as to license their OS to competitors and laying off substantial numbers of Apple staff - probably what prevailing corporate orthodoxy told him to do, but still a fantastically stupid idea. Jobs turned that around, and it's hard to see that change happening with his personal involvement. I don't think it's entirely unreasonable to say "no Jobs, no iPhone".

"A lot of people have to do work they don't like. What does he have to say to them?"

I dunno. He was talking to an audience of Stanford graduates at the time, and I think what he said is appropriate to that audience. I don't think he was insulting the people not in the audience by saying what he did to the people who were.

I don't really disagree as much as it sounds like, but I just don't see the point in resenting someone for encouraging people to make the most of their lives and work, and I don't see the point in denying his pivotal role in building a company which, whatever you think of it, has created prosperity for many.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 01:03 pm (UTC)
ext_51145: (Default)
From: [identity profile] andrewhickey.info
"has created prosperity for many."

Has it? Who?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] intellectualdwarf.wordpress.com - Date: 2011-10-06 01:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] andrewhickey.info - Date: 2011-10-06 01:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] intellectualdwarf.wordpress.com - Date: 2011-10-06 01:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] intellectualdwarf.wordpress.com - Date: 2011-10-06 01:42 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 09:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] australian-joe.livejournal.com
Hear hear!!

Being able to consider settling as a choice itself relies on an awful lot of privilege.

And wow, I'd heard there were human rights problems with the Chinese manufacturers but... yeah. Wow.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] benchilada.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-06 09:14 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] benchilada.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-07 01:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 09:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bonsai-human.livejournal.com
Bravo! The eulogising is making me a bit nauseous, too. (Came here via [livejournal.com profile] rosamicula).

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 10:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] australian-joe.livejournal.com
people are talking as if he made every iPhone by hand out of minerals he mined from the ground

Coming soon to Minecraft!

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 11:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bloodbeauty.livejournal.com
can i reblog this? i don't think i can say it better

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] braisedbywolves.livejournal.com
He didn't make your MacBook, but he did make your MacBook great - his eye for detail and tendency to operate on that level is legendary.

I'm obviously uncomfortable with the Randian idea of the engines of history being Men of Drive and Vision, but it would seem odd for me not to acknowledge it when I see it (not that 'rude' is exactly the word for posting this today), and mourn someone who had a massive positive effect on the world.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bonsai-human.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-06 09:51 pm (UTC) - Expand
From: [identity profile] benchilada.livejournal.com
BUT.

A crux-point of your argument is to get pissed at Jobs for giving words of encouragement to people who are stuck where they are? Of course "Don't settle" isn't possible for everyone, and you know damn well that Jobs isn't saying "EVERYBODY GETS ICE CREAM AND CANDY WHEN THEY CHASE THEIR RAINBOWS!"

Inspirational speeches are hyperbolic by nature. Look them up;it's how they work. And if we didn't have them, where would some people get the inspirational words they need to hear? And don't say "from within" or some bullshit. Some people don't have their own words of encouragement. You're upset because a person that a lot of people look up to--for better or worse--told them to keep fucking trying to reach their dreams? And that it's offensive for him to say because he's rich?

"To which I can only say OH DO F*** OFF!"

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quuf.livejournal.com
A great big Yes to the power of NO. This was a bracing thing to read after all the hive-mind buzzing. As a former Silicon Valley drudge, I thank you. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-06 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bonsai-human.livejournal.com
Oh wow, just read your edit. That is really, really sad. It's so hard to comprehend how such an intelligent, scientifically minded person could fall for that. Poor deluded soul.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-07 03:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tdaschel.livejournal.com
Real Talk.

.. but, jeez, your commentary blows IOZ (http://whoisioz.blogspot.com/2011/10/shantih-shantih-shitty.html)'s out th' water !

Well said

Date: 2011-10-07 09:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rocketeddy.livejournal.com
My twitter feed is full of fanboy whining from people who can't buy Apple's latest gizmo within seconds of its official release time. It's sickening. The worst thing I saw was somebody saying Apple needed to be more like Walmart ... eugh!

IMO Steve Jobs achieved his popularity in exactly the same way his company did - good PR. It doesn't seem to matter if the company is evil, or that its products aren't actually that good, people worship it because they're TOLD it's the best thing ever.

The one thing I will say in favour of Jobs is that he was a great example of meritocracy - he earned his fame, and his money. Perhaps he didn't deserve to reach quite the levels he did, and he certainly could've done a lot more good (or even less evil) with it than he did, but at least he isn't rich and famous just because of his ancestry, or because he won a lottery.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-07 01:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] plumsbitch.livejournal.com
Yes yes yes.

Profile

the cosmolinguist

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags