The way Steve Jobs is being eulogized around Twitter and Facebook bothers me.
He died young, and pancreatic cancer is an awful thing*. The personal tragedy for the people who knew him is foremost in my mind.
But beyond that, the image of him as the geek messiah is worryingly pervasive. As Andrew said, people are talking as if he made every iPhone by hand out of minerals he mined from the ground.
Let's not forget how those iPhones are actually made:
And of course not all this is entirely Steve Jobs' doing either; the Phone Story game is new and its ban was not while he was CEO. Not everything is his fault (though some things, like ending Apple's corporate philanthropy to save costs, are).
But this is part of the point. As CEO he might have been good at taking the credit, doing the flashy rock-star presentations Maybe he inspired you or maybe he just convinced you to give him your money. But he did not make your MacBook and he did not make Toy Story.
I am having a massive sense of humor fail about this. And it's not just because I hate Macs, even though I do. Apple products go against everything I hold dear about computers, like the right to change and improve my own possessions, use my media and data however I like, casting off the oppression of DRM, and still having some money left in the world after buying an mp3 player.
Then there's this quote of his I saw on someone's Facebook, and also heard on the radio as I was making my pancakes this morning...
"Don't settle" isn't a choice everybody has. My dad has been doing manual labor all his life, despite being clever, fun and witty as anyone on NPR being earnestly middle-class. My mom worked an incredibly stressful and draining job helping an autistic boy through school, for less than you make working at McDonald's. Andrew has a day job he loathes, because he can't afford to do what he wants (yet!) and considers it a higher priority in the meantime to support us than to be a visionary who gives inspiring speeches for a fee that would probably see us through a whole year.
Those poor bastards making the iPhones in China; do you think this is how they wanted their lives to be? Aren't they settling just to bring us your greatest new toys, Steve? A lot of people have to settle. A lot of people have to do work they don't like. What does he have to say to them? A lot of people have families to support, discrimination to face, barriers to getting jobs, or getting good ones...and just bad luck. Some of us have to have higher priorities than waking up every morning knowing we are doing nothing but good work that we love.
I'm not saying "don't try" -- obviously it's great if you can do good work that you love -- but don't be too hard on yourself if you can't. And don't insult the intelligence and personhood of someone who works in a factory or is a teaching assistant or whatever, just because compared to iSteve their life is less sexy and flashy and newsworthy. Or because they can't afford an iPod.
* Edit: As pointed out in comments: Most pancreatic cancers are aggressive and always terminal, but Steve was lucky (if you can call it that) and had a rare form called an islet cell neuroendocrine tumor, which is actually quite treatable with excellent survival rates — if caught soon enough. The median survival is about a decade, but it depends on how soon it’s removed surgically. Steve caught his very early, and should have expected to survive much longer than a decade. Unfortunately Steve relied on a naturopathic diet instead of early surgery. There is no evidence that diet has any effect on islet cell carcinoma. I find it a little more complicated to be sympathetic now, but it's still sad people keep falling for this hippie shit.
He died young, and pancreatic cancer is an awful thing*. The personal tragedy for the people who knew him is foremost in my mind.
But beyond that, the image of him as the geek messiah is worryingly pervasive. As Andrew said, people are talking as if he made every iPhone by hand out of minerals he mined from the ground.
Let's not forget how those iPhones are actually made:
Foxconn routinely forces it workers to work two to three times the legal Chinese limit and to work in brutal and often unsafe conditions that have led to many accidents... These working conditions led to 10 Foxconn worker suicides at the company's Shenzhen facility in 2010 alone. The suicide problem at Foxconn’s Chinese factories became so bad that the company put up steel wire to prevent workers from jumping and killing themselves.And more than that, Apple are actively trying to keep you from finding out the less savory side of your shiny phone.
And as Jobs was speaking in San Francisco [while announcing the iPhone], new measures were being secretly introduced at Foxconn to prevent the suicide scandal from worsening and damaging Apple sales globally.
Astonishingly, this involves forcing all Foxconn employees to sign a new legally binding document promising that they won't kill themselves.
Phone Story is intended to serve as a reminder for users of the impact, though indirectly accusing Apple of human rights violation via dangerous extraction of coltan, a mineral used in manufacturing of consumer electronics products, worker abuse under questionable conditions at companies such as Foxconn, and launching new products every year thus creating more e-waste. Apple has thus ban[ned] the app citing reasons including the depiction of violence or abuse against children and excessively objectionable or crude content.Content not suitable for games, apparently, but perfectly all right in real life.
And of course not all this is entirely Steve Jobs' doing either; the Phone Story game is new and its ban was not while he was CEO. Not everything is his fault (though some things, like ending Apple's corporate philanthropy to save costs, are).
But this is part of the point. As CEO he might have been good at taking the credit, doing the flashy rock-star presentations Maybe he inspired you or maybe he just convinced you to give him your money. But he did not make your MacBook and he did not make Toy Story.
I am having a massive sense of humor fail about this. And it's not just because I hate Macs, even though I do. Apple products go against everything I hold dear about computers, like the right to change and improve my own possessions, use my media and data however I like, casting off the oppression of DRM, and still having some money left in the world after buying an mp3 player.
Then there's this quote of his I saw on someone's Facebook, and also heard on the radio as I was making my pancakes this morning...
Your work is going to fill a large part of your life, and the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven't found it yet, keep looking. Don't settle. As with all matters of the heart, you'll know when you find it. And, like any great relationship, it just gets better and better as the years roll on. So keep looking. Don't settle.To which I can only say OH DO F*** OFF!
"Don't settle" isn't a choice everybody has. My dad has been doing manual labor all his life, despite being clever, fun and witty as anyone on NPR being earnestly middle-class. My mom worked an incredibly stressful and draining job helping an autistic boy through school, for less than you make working at McDonald's. Andrew has a day job he loathes, because he can't afford to do what he wants (yet!) and considers it a higher priority in the meantime to support us than to be a visionary who gives inspiring speeches for a fee that would probably see us through a whole year.
Those poor bastards making the iPhones in China; do you think this is how they wanted their lives to be? Aren't they settling just to bring us your greatest new toys, Steve? A lot of people have to settle. A lot of people have to do work they don't like. What does he have to say to them? A lot of people have families to support, discrimination to face, barriers to getting jobs, or getting good ones...and just bad luck. Some of us have to have higher priorities than waking up every morning knowing we are doing nothing but good work that we love.
I'm not saying "don't try" -- obviously it's great if you can do good work that you love -- but don't be too hard on yourself if you can't. And don't insult the intelligence and personhood of someone who works in a factory or is a teaching assistant or whatever, just because compared to iSteve their life is less sexy and flashy and newsworthy. Or because they can't afford an iPod.
* Edit: As pointed out in comments: Most pancreatic cancers are aggressive and always terminal, but Steve was lucky (if you can call it that) and had a rare form called an islet cell neuroendocrine tumor, which is actually quite treatable with excellent survival rates — if caught soon enough. The median survival is about a decade, but it depends on how soon it’s removed surgically. Steve caught his very early, and should have expected to survive much longer than a decade. Unfortunately Steve relied on a naturopathic diet instead of early surgery. There is no evidence that diet has any effect on islet cell carcinoma. I find it a little more complicated to be sympathetic now, but it's still sad people keep falling for this hippie shit.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 10:38 am (UTC)That isn't about blaming him for the outcome or knowing for sure, but it says something about using hippy crap and not getting good care cos of it and how pervasive and dangerous things like that can be - and how many people might have copied him?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 10:55 am (UTC)As a friend of mine commented on Facebook, "it says a lot about the cult of personality he built that posts i'm seeing about him are largely empty "inspiring genius" stuff or grumpy fact-laden stuff."
The man who said Bill Gates would've been better if he'd dropped acid or gone to an ashram would've been better himself if he'd had a bit more respect for the grumpy fact-laden stuff than the empty stuff. I worry how his cult of personality continues to affect people.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 01:06 pm (UTC)And the thing about median survival times is that by definition half the people don't survive that long...
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 11:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 11:24 am (UTC)And far from minding if you add me, I think it flattering :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 12:16 pm (UTC)It's not just Jobs either, all sorts of great-and-goods get paid for giving variants of this advice in various contexts (including plenty of broadsheet careers pages) and it just winds me up. They honestly seem to think there's a cause-and-effect relationship between "I stayed hungry/didn't settle/worked hard/followed my dreams" and "I enjoyed huge success". All the millions of tiny circumstances beyond their influence, all the little switches that had to be flipped the right way, even the macro-economic circumstances of their birth and young adulthood, for heaven's sake - it all gets absorbed into the post-factum narrative in which *their* actions were the critical factor. I really do think this is a corrosive creed - a slightly more sophisticated version of the idea that going on reality TV will make you rich and famous.
It never seems to occur to people like this that there might be millions of others for whom these exact same techniques did not work at all. It's partly a failure of imagination, but I guess partly they never have it brought to their attention because (shocker) nobody ever asks those other people to give presentations on why their life didn't entirely work out the way they wanted.
I suppose he was addressing a roomful of Stanford graduates, however, and the chances are not many of them will be forced by circumstances to settle, so in that sense it was a well-pitched speech.
Sorry for piggybacking my rant on your rant.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 01:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 01:07 pm (UTC)I even heard it on Radio 4 today and -- okay I forget, for all my devotion to it, that I am not Radio 4's most targeted demographic, which is more full of people haven't been settling (though I'm sure everyone with not just #firstworldproblems but Moneybox problems thinks they are settling because they want to know if they can squeeze in only two skiing holidays this year, or something). But even so, Facebook and the radio, in using this to canonize the man, are going out to a much wider audience than Jobs was addressing.
If I didn't make this clear I should've: my problem here is not with him but how he's being presented, if not canonized and mythologized, now that he's gone.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 12:48 pm (UTC)As for the "he didn't build the iPhones himself" argument, that's obviously true as a statement. As a metaphor for Apple though, I'm not sure that it works. Jobs co-founded the company, and it was successful during his first time there, and floundered after he left. Apple was a spent force in 1997 when he returned, and since that point has undergone a dramatic recovery. The only variable there was Steve Jobs as CEO. Gil Amelio practically ran the company into the ground, going so far as to license their OS to competitors and laying off substantial numbers of Apple staff - probably what prevailing corporate orthodoxy told him to do, but still a fantastically stupid idea. Jobs turned that around, and it's hard to see that change happening with his personal involvement. I don't think it's entirely unreasonable to say "no Jobs, no iPhone".
"A lot of people have to do work they don't like. What does he have to say to them?"
I dunno. He was talking to an audience of Stanford graduates at the time, and I think what he said is appropriate to that audience. I don't think he was insulting the people not in the audience by saying what he did to the people who were.
I don't really disagree as much as it sounds like, but I just don't see the point in resenting someone for encouraging people to make the most of their lives and work, and I don't see the point in denying his pivotal role in building a company which, whatever you think of it, has created prosperity for many.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 01:03 pm (UTC)Has it? Who?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 01:19 pm (UTC)It fits that the counselors and so on are an Apple thing, only because such measures seem so paltry and tacked-on, maybe letting rich white guys in America feel better should they ever spare it a thought, but it's difficult to see how they could have much of an affect on workers' lives. If involvement with Apple could get this, surely it could do better too.
I don't mean to say "Apple would've been EXACTLY THE SAME without Steve Jobs!", I'm just trying to counteract people who say "he INVENTED THE WORLD." I know the first initial rush of eulogies are not usually used to problematize Great Lives but, well, I didn't have a lot of sleep and I was cranky :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 09:19 am (UTC)Being able to consider settling as a choice itself relies on an awful lot of privilege.
And wow, I'd heard there were human rights problems with the Chinese manufacturers but... yeah. Wow.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 09:32 am (UTC)'I wish him [Bill Gates] the best, I really do,' Jobs once smirked. 'I just think he and Microsoft are a bit narrow. He'd be a broader guy if he had dropped acid once or gone off to an ashram when he was younger.'
Again: "the only way to live a good life is to do what I've done." It's just dreadful.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 09:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 01:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 10:26 am (UTC)Coming soon to Minecraft!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 11:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 12:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 12:57 pm (UTC)I'm obviously uncomfortable with the Randian idea of the engines of history being Men of Drive and Vision, but it would seem odd for me not to acknowledge it when I see it (not that 'rude' is exactly the word for posting this today), and mourn someone who had a massive positive effect on the world.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 01:59 pm (UTC)I genuinely do not understand this massive positive effect, if you don't give him sole credit for every Apple IIe and Pixar movie and whatever. I mean, there are billionaire CEOs who've had a massive positive effect on the world -- Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, etc -- by giving so much money to end poverty in Africa or whatever but in this case... I'm just confused. Steve Jobs was a good businessman, he just happened to be in the business of making shiny things poor people make and rich people buy.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:First, I don't own any Apple products. I dislike Apple.
Date: 2011-10-06 03:00 pm (UTC)A crux-point of your argument is to get pissed at Jobs for giving words of encouragement to people who are stuck where they are? Of course "Don't settle" isn't possible for everyone, and you know damn well that Jobs isn't saying "EVERYBODY GETS ICE CREAM AND CANDY WHEN THEY CHASE THEIR RAINBOWS!"
Inspirational speeches are hyperbolic by nature. Look them up;it's how they work. And if we didn't have them, where would some people get the inspirational words they need to hear? And don't say "from within" or some bullshit. Some people don't have their own words of encouragement. You're upset because a person that a lot of people look up to--for better or worse--told them to keep fucking trying to reach their dreams? And that it's offensive for him to say because he's rich?
"To which I can only say OH DO F*** OFF!"
Re: First, I don't own any Apple products. I dislike Apple.
Date: 2011-10-06 03:17 pm (UTC)If I didn't make this clear I should've: my problem here is not with him but how he's being presented, if not canonized and mythologized, now that he's gone.
Yes he gave just the kind of speech you get at graduations. I don't have to look them up; I heard my own. Yes it's all about inspiration and aspiration. I don't have any problem with that; it's just not what I wanted to hear when I was making breakfast because I've had to settle for some things due to illness and circumstance and bad luck and this made me feel like shit. I don't know Steve Jobs, people say he was great, hurrah for him, but I really hate the way he's being canonized. What he says to Stanford grads made them all clap, by the sounds of it, so they're all happy. I have no problem with it existing, just it being something that's supposed to be evidence of his greatness rather than being evidence of an inspirational speech.
Re: First, I don't own any Apple products. I dislike Apple.
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 05:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-07 01:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-06 09:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-07 01:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-07 03:37 am (UTC).. but, jeez, your commentary blows IOZ (http://whoisioz.blogspot.com/2011/10/shantih-shantih-shitty.html)'s out th' water !
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-07 01:08 pm (UTC)Well said
Date: 2011-10-07 09:11 am (UTC)IMO Steve Jobs achieved his popularity in exactly the same way his company did - good PR. It doesn't seem to matter if the company is evil, or that its products aren't actually that good, people worship it because they're TOLD it's the best thing ever.
The one thing I will say in favour of Jobs is that he was a great example of meritocracy - he earned his fame, and his money. Perhaps he didn't deserve to reach quite the levels he did, and he certainly could've done a lot more good (or even less evil) with it than he did, but at least he isn't rich and famous just because of his ancestry, or because he won a lottery.
Re: Well said
Date: 2011-10-07 01:28 pm (UTC)That, seriously, chills my blood. I have an animosity to Walmart that's almost at a visceral level. But I do find a lot of fanboys are thinking of it from the viewpoint Walmart wants them too: feeding their massive sense of entitlement and giving them no reason to think about the people who make that stuff in horrible conditions, or even the people who work retail (both Walmart and the Apple Store (in the U.S.) already use the same tactics of hiring staff only part-time so they don't get benefits like health insurance and can't even afford to buy it from their workplace, as is the most common and effective way of getting insurance, so a lot of them are probably among the uninsured millions). That people don't want to think about any of that, and just need the damn iPhone before anybody else, freaks me out.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-07 01:28 pm (UTC)