Happy colony
Apr. 27th, 2017 11:15 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Still typing on my phone (Andrew's got a new laptop but until it's set up needs mine 24/7 so that he can keep up a steady enough stream of Twitter) so I'll have to be quick.
I finally got to see last week's episode of Doctor Who and while generally I liked it (at first I was wary of the premise for how Russell Davies it sounded, but it didn't do too badly with it), there was one thought I had during it that has stuck in my brain.
So I don't think this is spoilery but obviously opinions on what counts as a spoiler differ. I'd say this is in the "it contained the following general types of plot device" category, but I suppose that might be up for debate too.
Because I'd seen a lot of people's reactions to this episode already, I knew one of them went something like "you can tell white people write Doctor Who because when he asks Bill why she wants to go to the future instead of the past, her answer isn't just 'I'm a black woman.' "
Similarly, I can tell the show isn't written by immigrants because it inescapably hinges on the colonists' assumption that they can be happy all the time because they're headed to this utopia that's been built for them where everything is perfect.
Even if it had lived up to those utopian expectations, that would not have stopped grief being there.
Moving so irrevocably away from home leaves you grieving for everyone you left there. Except in some ways its worse than if they died, because you know they're grieving for you too. Some people (if you're lucky, all of them if you're not) you will probably never see again, no matter how much you love them.
There'd be homesickness. There'd be nostalgia in the sense it was first intended, as a proper disease people even died from, as well as its colloquial meaning today. There'd be dreams about the voices of lost people. We're sometimes fine when contemplating the big things, but then cry because we remember the pattern on the dishes, the noise the door made when it closed, or the colors in the sky.
You couldn't have a colony without grief.
I finally got to see last week's episode of Doctor Who and while generally I liked it (at first I was wary of the premise for how Russell Davies it sounded, but it didn't do too badly with it), there was one thought I had during it that has stuck in my brain.
So I don't think this is spoilery but obviously opinions on what counts as a spoiler differ. I'd say this is in the "it contained the following general types of plot device" category, but I suppose that might be up for debate too.
Because I'd seen a lot of people's reactions to this episode already, I knew one of them went something like "you can tell white people write Doctor Who because when he asks Bill why she wants to go to the future instead of the past, her answer isn't just 'I'm a black woman.' "
Similarly, I can tell the show isn't written by immigrants because it inescapably hinges on the colonists' assumption that they can be happy all the time because they're headed to this utopia that's been built for them where everything is perfect.
Even if it had lived up to those utopian expectations, that would not have stopped grief being there.
Moving so irrevocably away from home leaves you grieving for everyone you left there. Except in some ways its worse than if they died, because you know they're grieving for you too. Some people (if you're lucky, all of them if you're not) you will probably never see again, no matter how much you love them.
There'd be homesickness. There'd be nostalgia in the sense it was first intended, as a proper disease people even died from, as well as its colloquial meaning today. There'd be dreams about the voices of lost people. We're sometimes fine when contemplating the big things, but then cry because we remember the pattern on the dishes, the noise the door made when it closed, or the colors in the sky.
You couldn't have a colony without grief.
(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 05:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 05:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 10:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 10:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 10:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 10:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 10:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 01:56 pm (UTC)I'm just back from a trip home, and after 32 years in Kent, not Durham, I'm still instinctively calling Durham 'home'. We did a trip into the local countryside while I was there and it's skylines and colours and wildlife that are right at some fundamental level.
I'm fortunate enough to be able to get up to Durham three or four times a year, but coming back to my theoretical home afterwards only seems to get harder.
(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 03:22 pm (UTC)Skylines are a big one for me, too. I realized in recent years I only feel "at home" with a nice big horizon around me. (Something I rarely experience here, even the seaside kinda works for this though obviously it's very different from living in the middle of a continent in every other way!) I miss seeing stars at night, too, which surprised me.
(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 04:34 pm (UTC)* I don't speak Welsh, but my best friend is Welsh and has talked about it.
(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-28 11:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-04-30 04:42 pm (UTC)How are you with heights?
Date: 2017-05-01 06:23 pm (UTC)Re: How are you with heights?
Date: 2017-05-01 08:31 pm (UTC)Cloud 23's not my type of place normally, though I do like that when you're there you don't see the Hilton blighting the skyline. ;)
Re: How are you with heights?
Date: 2017-05-01 08:34 pm (UTC)Re: How are you with heights?
Date: 2017-05-01 08:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-05-02 02:34 am (UTC)To me, it sounds like a standard government IT procurement snafu.
(no subject)
Date: 2017-05-02 08:09 am (UTC)