Radio song
Sep. 2nd, 2008 03:38 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
They're beautiful, aren't they?
Or is it just me?

Okay, maybe it is just me. Me and, probably, the people who work with them and extract amazing information about the universe from them. I don't have such intimate knowledge of radio telescopes and their usefulness, though I do have (thanks, largely, to Carl Sagan) an excited layperson's appreciation for those very things.
Even beyond what they mean, though, right now I'm just impressed at how these radio telescopes look. I do think they are beautiful, in that way that entirely functional things sometimes are. When no attention is paid to aesthetics, sometimes the functionality itself provides something pleasing to the eye.
In just a few seconds in a TV show mostly about something else that I find myself watching only because I love Ian Stewart, who's presenting it (as he's introducing himself at the beginning I am, for the second time in only a couple of hours, impressed at how Scottish people can say "Stewart" (or "Stuart" I suppose) in only one syllable), I was struck by these shots of radio telescopes, enough to catch them and put them here.

It's so easy to anthropomorphize the telescopes. Maybe it's the particular angle of these dishes that makes me believe they could be upturned faces, maybe it's the way the precise uniformity of their alignment reminds me of a military drill team.

I like this picture because they look so curious. While I know about perspective -- some cows are small, and some are far away -- I still say their small size against the big horizon makes them look childlike, in full possession of their sensawunda, and making me wonder what they're all looking at over there.
Or is it just me?

Okay, maybe it is just me. Me and, probably, the people who work with them and extract amazing information about the universe from them. I don't have such intimate knowledge of radio telescopes and their usefulness, though I do have (thanks, largely, to Carl Sagan) an excited layperson's appreciation for those very things.
Even beyond what they mean, though, right now I'm just impressed at how these radio telescopes look. I do think they are beautiful, in that way that entirely functional things sometimes are. When no attention is paid to aesthetics, sometimes the functionality itself provides something pleasing to the eye.
In just a few seconds in a TV show mostly about something else that I find myself watching only because I love Ian Stewart, who's presenting it (as he's introducing himself at the beginning I am, for the second time in only a couple of hours, impressed at how Scottish people can say "Stewart" (or "Stuart" I suppose) in only one syllable), I was struck by these shots of radio telescopes, enough to catch them and put them here.

It's so easy to anthropomorphize the telescopes. Maybe it's the particular angle of these dishes that makes me believe they could be upturned faces, maybe it's the way the precise uniformity of their alignment reminds me of a military drill team.

I like this picture because they look so curious. While I know about perspective -- some cows are small, and some are far away -- I still say their small size against the big horizon makes them look childlike, in full possession of their sensawunda, and making me wonder what they're all looking at over there.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 02:42 pm (UTC)I like the
smallfar-away ones the best.(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 02:52 pm (UTC)I love those small ones. :) I looked for a picture like that online and when I couldn't find one, that's when I decided I had to make some screenshots. It's just a great image. Well, I think so anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 03:04 pm (UTC)It's really easy to imagine them with faces...
I'll let you know about the butter-bound toast-crumbs soon, by the way! ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 03:15 pm (UTC)And yes, anthropomorphization (spelled my way or yours) is a word. :)
I'm v. interested in your butter/crumbs result! :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 11:01 pm (UTC)It's because they look like the Pixar lamp! I'm not sure whether this is a good thing or not. I think my brain is very silly indeed.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 01:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 09:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 05:19 am (UTC)p.s. the VLA is reason #762 why New Mexico is cooler than Arizona.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 09:24 am (UTC)If I ever get my US road trip that some of my friends have been promising me for a while, I would totally love to go see things like the VLA. Some of them live in Colorado so it wouldn't be that far away!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 01:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 05:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 07:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 03:03 pm (UTC)And yes, they are beautiful. I've often wished I lived within a short drive of a setup like that so I could visit it regularly.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 03:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 03:22 pm (UTC)*unless it involves the motorway
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 03:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 03:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 10:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 04:00 pm (UTC)(But seriously: they really are beautiful)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 10:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 04:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 10:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 06:34 pm (UTC)I love this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/teamdroid/65402613/
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 11:04 pm (UTC)Those pictures are great!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 10:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 10:26 am (UTC)