On success
May. 6th, 2004 01:12 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
How do you measure greatness in a LiveJournal?
Not that you have ever tried, probably. I myself never thought about it until tonight; I walked to the grocery store, and I think weird things when I go for walks. But since I did think about it, I'll impose my thoughts on you (that is, after all, what LiveJournal is for, right?).
My journal seems to have come a long way from its beginnings a year and a half ago as something
soltice told me about when I complained that I never wrote anything anymore. Now I have plans to meet (and maybe even sleep with! or at least make out with?) a half-dozen people I met via LiveJournal...and those plans will have to wait until I get back from England, where I plan to stay for the summer with a person I met via LiveJournal. Less obviously--but no less importantly--now that many of my real-life friends have journals, I know new things about my old friends. And they could probably say the same for me.
Anyway, greatness? How to measure it? Right, here we go.
Greatness wouldn't be the number of friends the journal has: I have about 60 friends--and that's enough to keep up with!--and about 80 people say I'm their friend. (I know there are people who get really agitated about this use of "friend," but I'm not one of them; I don't care if the list says "friend of" or "read by" or "people stalking me." Though my "friends" list does include some of the people I'm closest to, it also includes people whose real names I'll never know who just happen to write things I think are fun to read.) I don't really care who adds me or subtracts me or whatever, and I hope my random whims in doing so don't affect other people too much, because they're not meant to.
Greatness wouldn't be the number of comments the journal gets. Sure, one entry might have almost 200, but the next one might have none! I like comments because I like talking with my friends and I love watching them talk with each other--and the tangents are always fun; I love tangents--but I know that some of those comments consist only of me saying "Cool!" and that's not worth getting excited about.
If I were to think my journal at all "great," it would be because I have achieved one really cool thing: I've noticed my friends adding other friends of mine. I know some of them were friends before, and I know some already belonged to the same social circles, either in real life or on LJ, but I also know that some of them have spotted each other here or shared conversational exchanges in my journal's comments and ended up "friends." I've done the same thing myself--that's how I got a lot of my random LJ friends. You guys have good taste!
My journal is not so much about the things I've written. I rather like a few of those things, but I'm not going to win any prizes for them. My journal makes me happy because of the people who read it and talk about it. I'm not an exhibitionist or even a voyeur, I just like my friends. (Notice when I talked about where my journal's gotten in its year and a half, I didn't talk about how my writing matured, I talked about how relationships formed and matured.) Writing things down on paper, while still having its merits, now seems to noticably lack that aspect, if you ask me.
Not that anyone did. Or will.
And not that I'm trying to get all sappy here or anything. I may love you, but I don't want your Bud Light. I just wanted you to know that you make http://holly-lama.livejournal.com/friends a cool place.
Not that you have ever tried, probably. I myself never thought about it until tonight; I walked to the grocery store, and I think weird things when I go for walks. But since I did think about it, I'll impose my thoughts on you (that is, after all, what LiveJournal is for, right?).
My journal seems to have come a long way from its beginnings a year and a half ago as something
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Anyway, greatness? How to measure it? Right, here we go.
Greatness wouldn't be the number of friends the journal has: I have about 60 friends--and that's enough to keep up with!--and about 80 people say I'm their friend. (I know there are people who get really agitated about this use of "friend," but I'm not one of them; I don't care if the list says "friend of" or "read by" or "people stalking me." Though my "friends" list does include some of the people I'm closest to, it also includes people whose real names I'll never know who just happen to write things I think are fun to read.) I don't really care who adds me or subtracts me or whatever, and I hope my random whims in doing so don't affect other people too much, because they're not meant to.
Greatness wouldn't be the number of comments the journal gets. Sure, one entry might have almost 200, but the next one might have none! I like comments because I like talking with my friends and I love watching them talk with each other--and the tangents are always fun; I love tangents--but I know that some of those comments consist only of me saying "Cool!" and that's not worth getting excited about.
If I were to think my journal at all "great," it would be because I have achieved one really cool thing: I've noticed my friends adding other friends of mine. I know some of them were friends before, and I know some already belonged to the same social circles, either in real life or on LJ, but I also know that some of them have spotted each other here or shared conversational exchanges in my journal's comments and ended up "friends." I've done the same thing myself--that's how I got a lot of my random LJ friends. You guys have good taste!
My journal is not so much about the things I've written. I rather like a few of those things, but I'm not going to win any prizes for them. My journal makes me happy because of the people who read it and talk about it. I'm not an exhibitionist or even a voyeur, I just like my friends. (Notice when I talked about where my journal's gotten in its year and a half, I didn't talk about how my writing matured, I talked about how relationships formed and matured.) Writing things down on paper, while still having its merits, now seems to noticably lack that aspect, if you ask me.
Not that anyone did. Or will.
And not that I'm trying to get all sappy here or anything. I may love you, but I don't want your Bud Light. I just wanted you to know that you make http://holly-lama.livejournal.com/friends a cool place.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 01:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 06:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 01:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 06:58 am (UTC)And we do have Internet access at my house, but it's dial-up and it takes up our phone line (and there's a good chance I'll have to fight with my brother to get near the computer at all).
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 01:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 06:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 07:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 03:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 07:48 am (UTC)I'm happy to do my part in making your friends page a fun place to hang out. [nibbles ear]
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 07:57 am (UTC)Which is really easy for me. I love pasta and chocolate and yes, even bread (it's very helpful in making sandwiches, I've found), and meat doesn't really do much for me. And I'm not grossly obese--nay, I'm told I'm beautiful! even from people who've only seen bad pictures of me!--so there.
I actually saw a commercial for Bud Light yesterday (which probably made me think of the old Bud Light (at least I think that's what they were) commercial I'm referencing in this post) that made a big deal of light beer being low in carbs. Bah! This country is full of crazy people!
Which is why I'm so happy to have cool people around who write cool stuff in their journals every day. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 08:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 08:51 am (UTC)I hate you.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 09:55 am (UTC)[sigh] You'd think I'd learn not to mention it.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 10:00 am (UTC)Man, you shouldn't be so nice when I'm being silly, it catches me off guard.
My friends really are very good to me. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 11:29 am (UTC)But if it makes you feel any better, I didn't go to Chipotle for lunch today. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 12:21 pm (UTC)And just because I ca't enjoy the wonders of Chipotle myself doesn't mean I wish a similar fate on other people.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 01:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 08:42 am (UTC)Anyway, enjoy the summer.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 08:43 am (UTC)*hugs*
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 08:53 am (UTC)And thanks for not mentioning the throwaway reference to a beer commercial that seems to be all anyone else has picked up on. :-) Your reaction is more like what I was going for here.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 09:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 10:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 10:23 am (UTC)I know you picked up on it--I love you guys for your intelligence, after all--and I don't really care anyway. True, this time I was in fact making the point that my LJ friends are cool, but if they didn't notice they were being complimented it'd be their loss, not mine. :-)
And if nothing else it proves my point about how odd and tangential strings of comments can be.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 10:17 am (UTC)Hmmm...now you've got me thinking about the evolution of my email account's address book and "safe" list...
Helga
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 10:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 01:55 pm (UTC)So thank *YOU*. Very much...
You discovered Chuck through my list though...
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 02:00 pm (UTC)*tries to remember that far back, realizes it was only a few months ago, and despairs of both her short and long term memory*
But, hey, it's the end result that counts, right? *whistles innocently*
Helga
-not for the first time glad that Andrew has a better memory for these things than I do
Of tasty bugs and stolen munchkins
Date: 2004-05-06 02:09 pm (UTC)I can't tell you about how I "met" all my LJ friends, but some of the random encounters stick out in my mind, and since this one was fairly recent and had a fairly big impact on my life already, it seems to have hung on in my memory a little bit. And who wouldn't like a story that involves tasty bugs and stolen munchkins.
Oh, and by the way
Date: 2004-05-06 02:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 08:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 03:27 pm (UTC)And after literally hours on hours--okay, minutes--of torturous and deep contemplative thought, I finally came to the answer:
You take the number of entries/posts divided by words in those post multiplied by the number of actual LJ friends divided by the actual number of registered LJ users subtracted from people in the world and...awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwe nuts, that's way too difficult...just use a yardstick.