In grammar yesterday, we diagrammed more sentences. I wasn't quite overwhelmed with joy (though some of the sentences are funny: "Some people consider Minnesota's winters excessively long." "Our grocer calls asparagus the Rolls Royce of vegetables." "Kristi became the Webmistress for a new dot-com company."--which just made me think What? I never thought of "webmaster" having a feminine form! What an ugly word!) until we got to "Jeff pleaded innocent."
It's deceptively simple, which is only part of its allure, if you ask me. You have your subject, Jeff. Your verb, pleaded. Your ... innocent. What is that? First someone said it was functioning as a noun. It's a condition, a state, an idea. He entered a plea of innocent. That would make pleaded a transitive verb. It was also said that innocent could be seen as an adverb, added to the--intransitive in this case--verb pleaded. Then, it was said that innocent could be an adjective to describe Jeff, which would make it a linking verb!
Our teacher likes to say that diagramming sentences is the only time English looks like math. "Only it's better than math," she said. "Math only has one right answer. Here, you can ask 'is it an adverb, adjective, or noun?' 'Linking, transitive, or intransitive?' And the answer is ... yes! Everything's right!"
It's deceptively simple, which is only part of its allure, if you ask me. You have your subject, Jeff. Your verb, pleaded. Your ... innocent. What is that? First someone said it was functioning as a noun. It's a condition, a state, an idea. He entered a plea of innocent. That would make pleaded a transitive verb. It was also said that innocent could be seen as an adverb, added to the--intransitive in this case--verb pleaded. Then, it was said that innocent could be an adjective to describe Jeff, which would make it a linking verb!
Our teacher likes to say that diagramming sentences is the only time English looks like math. "Only it's better than math," she said. "Math only has one right answer. Here, you can ask 'is it an adverb, adjective, or noun?' 'Linking, transitive, or intransitive?' And the answer is ... yes! Everything's right!"
Until...
Date: 2003-09-09 08:47 pm (UTC)Re: Until...
Date: 2003-09-09 10:41 pm (UTC)...and I thought it was just me.
Re: Until...
Date: 2003-09-10 10:02 am (UTC)Re: Until...
Date: 2003-09-13 12:15 am (UTC)Alas, my own egotism and megalomaniacal tendencies have yet to reach their full potential. Or so I'd hope. If this is as good as they get, I'm in trouble :/
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-13 06:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-09 10:56 pm (UTC)Better than math... indeed.... really...
Date: 2003-09-10 12:19 am (UTC)The one right answer is what it's all about... what's the point if there is multiple answers, that's just sloppy. Better than math. Trust an english teacher to come up with something as illogical as that.
:)
Like the whole i before e unless after c, or whenever else we feel like messing with you and just swapping them around. At least maths follows the rules.
And Webmistress, I don't think it's an ugly word, it sounds kind of kinky... :)
Better than math! Indeed! Really! :-D
Date: 2003-09-10 02:02 pm (UTC)Oh, and I think you meant "what's the point if there are multiple answers." ::laughs a grammar nerd laugh and runs away before you can hit her::
Webmistress...
Date: 2003-09-10 02:25 pm (UTC)It's the combination of the imagery of a dominatrix that comes from female spiders and the whole leather clad mistress thing, and a geek girl.
So what we have is a spunky, firey passionate, confident, in-control type geek girl. Who looks good in leather. The kind of girl that's entirely too much for most geek guys to handle, but loves taking them for a ride, out of which they will stagger bewildered, dizzy and happy. Kinda like Acid Burn in Hackers. Kinda. But not entirely.
I have this image in my mind that's like 'Woah' (in the way only Keanu can say it) of a girl that's the kind I envy other people having, but don't actually want for myself, because I know it's more than I can handle.
I think I may have said too much already...
Re: Webmistress...
Date: 2003-09-10 02:38 pm (UTC)P.S.
Date: 2003-09-10 02:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-10 06:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-10 07:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-10 07:24 am (UTC)"Jeff pleaded insanity," may have been more fitting.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-10 07:10 am (UTC)Have you ever read any of The Deluxe Transitive Vampire?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-10 10:00 am (UTC)I found that a rather odd coincidence. Sounds like an interesting book!
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-10 07:59 pm (UTC)Oh, and don't you realise vampires are never non-sequiturs? Especially transitive ones.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-10 08:13 pm (UTC)(And now, for a non sequitur of my own, I really like that icon of yours.)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-11 10:15 am (UTC)and I think 'innocent' is direct object; it just sounds awkward because i'm assuming it's been shortened over the years
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-12 11:21 am (UTC)