So they call it a "Senate" in Canada, but it sounds like it's just the House of Lords!
I'm embarrassed by how surprised I was to learn this, especially in a conversation in the pub with a Canadian who, y'know, thinks highly of me.
At least they don't have bishops in the government!
But man. I need a good recommendation for a book about Canadian history and/or politics. They didn't teach me anything in school.
I'm embarrassed by how surprised I was to learn this, especially in a conversation in the pub with a Canadian who, y'know, thinks highly of me.
At least they don't have bishops in the government!
But man. I need a good recommendation for a book about Canadian history and/or politics. They didn't teach me anything in school.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-11-23 02:18 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_election,_1993
It's a "what happens when you have 4+ parties competing nationally under FPTP" combined with "populist right wing parties splitting the Tory vote can cause amusing things". It's the closest model we have to look at for what might happen in the UK next year, although unfortunately it's unlikely Campbell's fate will happen to Cameron.
But yeah, the Canadian Senate is basically the House of Lords with a proper set of rules and some sensible additions (like a retirement age, and a restriction on numbers, and a requirement the peers come from different parts of the country, etc). It's not a good system, but it's one of the better ideas for a revisionary second chamber out there.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-11-24 10:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-11-24 04:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-11-26 04:24 am (UTC)