I am not going wall climbing in Preston tonight.

I've never gone wall climbing in Preston, so why is it noteworthy that I am not doing so right now?

I have a relatively-local mastodon friend who said she's doing this today, as part of a group organized by Galloways, the local blind society. She said she had done it before, at 12 or 13, but not since. I commented on the uncanny coincidence; I'd also loved wall climbing at 12 and 13, when I did it as part of summer camp -- for blind kids, as it happened. And I also hadn't done it since.

I didn't think much else of it, until D said "You could go wall climbing on Monday." I'd assumed it'd be during work hours, my own local society's events always had been and that's why I haven't done any since I started uni in 2017. But he said this one was on Monday night -- and he was even willing to drive me, bless him. I don't know Preston at all so going on my own the first time would not have been at all feasible, unless someone was willing to meet me from the train (the station is the only part of Preston I do know, and boy do I know it; I've spent many chilly hours there waiting for connecting trains!).

Anyway. D said the website details for this event just say "Contact James for details," but with no email or phone number, or even a last name for James.

I had to go back to my acquaintance to ask her how to get in touch with them about this; she said she'd just gotten in touch via the form on the website, after finding out about it in a Facebook group.

So I did that.

And while I was bemoaning this situation, it reminded me that I used to be very vaguely involved in Manchester's own local society, Henshaws, back in like 2015. They had activity-based groups too; I went on a few "hikes" around Greater Manchester, and joined the Museums and Galleries group for a live audio-described tour of an exhibit at Manchester Art Gallery. But all that stuff had been on weekdays, during the day, so I hadn't considered it a possibility now that I'm working full time.

I looked at their website and it was similarly directed at sighted people. The list of groups again was light on detail. I did see that the museum/gallery group was on Thursday afternoons. But it was only once a month, maybe I could take the half-day off for it... I sighed and got in touch the only way I could: via webform. It feels like such an inelegant solution.

A day or two later, both had gotten back to me.

James (who now had a last name and an e-mail address!) said

Thanks for your email
Yes we have a session on Monday evening from 7 till 9
At prestonwall
Please let me know if you are attending
You will also need to pre register with the climbing centre [and here he gave the link]
Thanks

It's fine, but I guess I'd been expecting something a little more informative.

I had a look at the climbing centre's website. They reasonably enough need to make sure everyone is safe. Registration involves reading the Conditions of Use and Rules, and something about supervising Novices. I thought I was more likely to be a novice than to be allowed to supervise them. Next you have to watch a video, "bouldering induction." I don't know what bouldering is. I didn't feel like I was going to learn from watching a video. Then you have to register...as either a Novice, Boulderer, Boulderer + Auto Belay, or Full Registration. Novice sounded about right for me, but that category is "for 18+ years on instructed sessions or being supervised by experienced climber." "Experienced climber" was a link of its own; this is a term with a specific technical definition here.

Would the blind group be an instructed session?? Or supervised by experienced climbers? Surely we couldn't be considered "boulderers," the criteria for which was you had to watch the video I'd already ruled out. But I wasn't sure how to register, and I was looking at this in a break from work, and it was already Friday, and I wouldn't expect to get answers over the weekend, and Preston is a long way away for when there's work in the morning, and so I determined pretty quickly that it wasn't going to happen this time. The mere possibility quickly overwhelmed me.

As for Henshaws, I mentioned the walking group and the museums/galleries group, and they said the walking group (which is still listed on the website but with no details) is "currently on hold at the moment. Unfortunately, I am unable to give a timeframe of how long this will be for." I seem to remember hearing that the guy who ran it (who of course also had a million other jobs) was leaving; maybe the group disappeared with him.

About the other group, this e-mail went on to say

If you are happy for me to do so, I can give you a call and register your details with Henshaws. I would then be able to pass these over to the Group Leader of the Arts, Galleries and Museums Group.

I could ask the Group Leader to share details of the group with dates, times, and venue of the next meet up.

Please call the office on: [number] or let me know when works for you, and I will give you a call.

Such a faff! I appreciate they have to keep track of numbers and things for these groups, but having to register just to wander along seems a bit overkill. Annoyingly, I know I am registered with Henshaws too, but under a different name and different address... it's easier to just be a new person.

And I know they do this as phone calls because most of the blindies they deal with will prefer that as if nothing else they tend to be old people, but gah why isn't there an option to do this via e-mail or the website too; I'd be long done with it already! It's another way that local blind societies are not set up for working people, because this person e-mailing me will want to call me during their working hours, but those are mine too! I can make some time for this but it's still frustrating. And not everyone can block out time in their work schedule as easily as I can for nonsense like this.

This is what I get for trying to work on my resolution of meeting new people and doing more stuff, ha. This is what attempts to better myself get me!

I got my new glasses today.

I used to be very familiar with what the new glasses felt like at first before you get used to them; it happened every couple of years or so.

But this time, I have a new association with it. And that's because last time, I got two pairs of glasses: in addition to the regular ones I have special ones for computer use.

And at first, wearing them when I looked at anything other than my computer was impossible -- I once dropped something from my desk and just learning over to pick it up made me feel like I was on a roller coaster all of a sudden. Eventually I got used to them to the extent that it wasn't a problem until I like stood up; only rarely did I not notice by that point if I was wearing the wrong glasses. It's a very distinctive headache I start to get right away.

My new glasses arrived around lunchtime.

I estimate I've thought Oh no, I'm wearing my computer glasses, I should go change them! about three hundred times between then and when I took my glasses off for bed just now.

ATC

Mar. 13th, 2024 07:35 pm

Me all year: why isn't there a better combination of a white cane and a walking cane??

The internet, after three months of this: People have already had this long enough to write reviews of it!

Goddammit!

Of course it's a hundred fucking quid.

But it might still be worth it, not just for my ankle which hopefully will be less of a problem as time goes on, but because I was already thinking about how useful such a thing would be for like hiking which I'd love to be able to do more of.

But yeah this would make such a difference now. Lately, especially in Brussels where I did a lot of walking but even just around town, I find myself having to bring all the canes and swap between them.

Last Saturday, I sat down at a bus stop, folded the walking cane (MB has plenty and is happy to let me borrow this one for the duration), put it in my backpack, took out my long cane and unfolded. I thought to myself I'm for sure gonna end up on video as "fake disabled person."

It makes sense to me! For instance, this time I used the walking cane while walking through the city centre and around an art gallery. Once I was waiting for a bus home, I knew I was mostly done with walking and it becomes more important for the driver and other passengers to know I can't see.

These calculations are getting more routine, but they're still exhausting. Maybe it is worth a hundred quid to do less of them (depending on how much cognitive cost there is in me learning how to use the new cane...).

My nystagmus has still been bad today. Not helped by basically doing a day and a half's work in a single day.

One in front of the computer which is bad for my eyes (and listening to the Spring Budget which is relevant to my job but bad for my soul; I lasted about five minutes before I had to tear my headphones off my head because the way the Hulture Secretary talked about immigrants was actually triggery).

And then a half on a site visit, which is also hard on the eyes (though made easier by D giving me a lift there because I had too much time pressure to go by public transport, and then him also having to give me a lift back even though I said I'd get the bus because I'd managed to leave home without my bus pass, my wallet, or my good mask...or any idea of where to catch my bus, the supreme irony of going to a bus interchange but the new one won't be open for a couple weeks).

I remember seeing unconvincing sketches when I first started volunteering by going to online meetings at the end of 2020, of the mostly-finished place I saw today. It's pretty cool to see how some of its wilder features have turned out.

Today I had an eye test so my nystagmus has been off the charts for the rest of the day. I needed a nap after work and everything -- more impressively, I was actually able to take a nap!

I only marginally need new glasses, but I'm getting them. Basically the main reason the optician advised I get them because mine are so beat-up. With the new prescription I can only see one more line of letters on the eye chart, and the optician said she wouldn't normally recommend new glasses for that but for me one more line is a big deal.

So I've had to spend three hundred quid on one line! It only had three letters on it and I could only read two of them! Ha.

I have been feeling mentally fragile since, which is only to be expected. It's a combination of triggers and the staff's odd (I thought!) willingness to accept me as a woman, which for Reasons I still am registeted as in this one healthcare setting.

It seems very unfair that I still had to work the rest of the day. And most unfair of all that right at the end of the work day I was told I'm going to London on Monday for something incredibly annoying and shitty.

Sitting at my computer before, I was like "ah, my eyes hurt in that way that means I forgot to swap to my computer glasses!"

I was already looking forward to feeling less bad when I realized I already had them on. This is as good as it gets today!!

I slept better last night and I don't have a headache for the first time in about 10 days. These things often correlate with "good" eye days for me. But there's never guarantees about that stuff.

Yesterday, besides going to the gym I went into town and with D and a friend investigated the new location for a queer bookstore and then had a pint.

It wouldn't have registered as "a lot of walking" before but on top of having gone to the gym I wasn't surprised that, just before we got to the bus stop to head home, I was really glad that we were already almost there because something that might have actually been my ankle -- instead of the muscles in my foot and leg, which is all I'm used to -- started to feel pretty sore and weak.

I was fine getting home, but once I did I crashed pretty heavily. Less because of the physical issues and more because of mental/emotional overwhelm I think: it'd been a big day for the friend, and their situation unfortunately involved some old triggers for me so I was dealing with that. And it'd been another demanding week at work. And even though I feel like I've been sleeping okay the last few days, it's only "okay" by the standards of a chronic insomniac whose dog spent a week waking him up 3-4 times a night.

And this was the first time I'd been anywhere other than a store or our local pub since I broke my ankle, so it was overwhelming to be around crowds and stuff again. The bar we ended up at wasn't busy but it was noisy: what I thought was a loud group of about eight people ended up just being one loud guy, oof. And of the "cis gay who thinks he can't be misogynist because he's gay" type. So that was a lot all by itself.

Also, using a walking cane for my ankle means I'm not using my white cane for my eyes. This has been fine so far because it's not like I've been moving quickly, and I've been in pretty controlled and/or familiar environments, like the hospital or Tesco or the usual streets near my house. Being in town was a lot. People didn't seem to give me as much of a break as I'm used to. I missed my white cane when I had to judge curb heights and find similar unevenness with my feet instead of my cane, which is especially unfortunate when one of those feet is extra weak and I'm particularly trying to avoid any amount of unevenness because it's more likely to make my foot sore! People who need walking aids and white canes must have a whole different kind of training than the one I got -- I hope they do anyway! -- because there are definitely a lot of skills I don't have and would really need if this was going to be a long-term thing.

And it was dark (well, at first just getting dark but that's nearly as bad), and wet so the ground was shiny and reflecting all the points of light that were already doing my head in.

I say all this to say that I'm really glad that after all of that, I actually feel great today! Some combination of ibuprofen, ice and rest when I got home meant my ankle didn't disrupt my sleep or hurt today. I took it easy enough in the gym that the next day I'm not beset by muscle soreness to the sam extent as the people I went with. And we had no real plans today which meant I could stay in my pajamas and sit on the couch and read and stuff (amid a million dog walks and other demands he placed on us all!). Still a day with some emotional triggers in it, but much less so and I'm hopeful that this particular set of external events will feel less intense to my lizard brain after today.

Tidying

Jan. 7th, 2024 11:08 pm

I haven't been able to find our tube of ibuprofen gel for a couple weeks, in the haphazard way where every few days I'd think "that'd be ideal for the swelling on my ankle..." and then I didn't see it in the drawer where it's supposed to live, it wasn't in the upstairs bathroom, I kept forgetting to check the downstairs bathroom because I tended to think of this at bedtime when I was already upstairs...

Tonight I did remember to check the downstairs bathroom before I went there, and it wasn't there! So that got me to actually ask MB, who bless her looked in the same places I just had, and checked her bedside table, and the less-used bedside table in her room in that "surely not but now I'm irritated that I can't find it" way -- I'd already checked my own bedside table for the same reason! -- and even she couldn't find it anywhere.

When I ask sighted people for help finding a thing and they can't do it, it's always bittersweet for me. Like "phew at least I didn't miss it when it was right in front of my face!" but also "goddammit I still don't have the thing!" (and possibly I've gotten someone else annoyed at not being able to find it just like I was, which feels like I've spread a mind virus or something).

(For this reason, of course, it's also bittersweet when they find it exactly where we all thought it would be and where I already looked really really hard. I feel like a dingbat. But at least I have the thing!)

I thanked her and went back to my bedroom, where my inability to locate ibuprofen gel had involved actually locating a number of other problems. A couple things had fallen behind the bedside table. A dead candle was still waiting to be disposed of. I finally tried changing the battery in my teeny vibrator again and found that it's what's dead, nit the battery. (Sad times, I liked that thing and never got enough use out of it!) The OTC sinus medication I used to use has expired, since now that I'm staying out of shared air as much as I can and masking when I can't has meant I haven't had a sinus infection in four years when I used to spend much of the winter with them.

You know. All kinds of little things like that.

So I sorted things into more sensible arrangements and put things away and threw things away and moved things one step closer to where they should be (e.g. at least all the meds that have to be returned to a pharmacy are in the same place now!).

And at the very end of this of course I found the ibuprofen gel. In a ludicrous place it never should have been. Which is the only option once you've really exhausted any possibility that it's been where it should have been all along.

I went to bed early-ish intending to change the sheets on my bed, but then all my energy went on this ludicrous endeavor.

But hey, at least my foot has some ibuprofen on it now!

The first thing I heard about my physiotherapy referral is that I had been discharged

The saga! Has a happy ending though: tl;dr I got my first appointment today. )

So anyway, today the very kind [personal profile] diffrentcolours came with me because I was convinced I'd get lost finding the part of the hospital I needed, and indeed we did get pretty lost (the signs were terrible, but luckily people were nice about directing us) but it was also good having him there for the appointment. He took notes of the exercises I was told to do and we ended up in a funny routine where the physio asked me a question, I answered it, and then D and I went off in some kind of familect-laden or generally confusing-af tangent while the phsyio took advantage of this time to type up notes on whatever I'd just told her.

The phsyio had a ponytail and was named Becky and was in all ways exactly what I thought a physiotherapist would be like...except she was awesome about blind stuff! When she called my name of course I bonked my walking cane into something in the process of walking towards her, and then did it again in the short trip down the corridor. She seemed surprisingly (to me, but I guess that's being a physio!) alarmed at this even when I brushed it off as normal for me (and I wasn't hurt at all; it was the cane that bonked into things, my squishy human body was untouched) and said "would you like me to guide you?" and stuck her arm out just slightly in exactly the perfect way for this. She was so proactive and so skilled and so casual about this that I was actually confused -- I do not expect any of this from the general public! -- and figured she had pretty close contact with someone visually impaired. Sure enough: her mum (she later told me that she was pleased at getting to tell her mum that yesterday was World Braille Day because she saw it in a work email and her mum didn't know about this even though she's a braille user; that was cute).

The appointment was reassuring on a number of levels. For one, she told me that all they can do when someone still has foot-jail is get them to like wiggle their foot around a little. The real work starts at the stage I'm at now. I did tell her I'm only unofficially at this wearing-both-of-my-shoes stage, since my followup fracture-clinic appointment was delayed by the holidays and then canceled by the junior-doctor strike, but she seemed totally unbothered about that and basically assured me I wasn't doing anything wrong by abandoning foot-jail based solely on vibes.

She measured my range of motion which has gotten surprisingly good (one of the big reasons I abandoned foot jail is that it was actually hurting me more to not be able to move my ankle than it does to move it) and is now only slightly less than my other foot. She also found that ankle to be weaker than the other one to the expected extent ("otherwise why would you be here?"), nothing to worry about. She showed me the exercises to do, gave me the resistance bands for them, and I'll see her again in two weeks!

She even said I can go back to the gym (very carefully of course!), and said a few minutes a few times a week on an exercise bike with low to no resistance would be good for my ankle, as long as it doesn't cause me any pain. So that's exciting. My trans gym class doesn't start up again until next week so I'm looking forward to doing a super-careful version of it then.

I'm glad I didn't really miss much in practical terms from not starting this a month ago. But I do wish it had happened for the sake of my mental state; I've been feeling confused and abandoned to my own devices, which aren't very good! Having no experience with this kind of injury, and finding that I wasn't in pain at the time if I overdid it but only that night when I couldn't sleep at all meant that I was always conscious of the possibility of overdoing it and setting myself back without knowing it at the time. But also I didn't want to be too driven by avoiding pain and fatigue because that would set my recovery back too. But without help I couldn't know which kinds of pain or fatigue to avoid and which to induce!

She also reminded me that ice and ibuprofen are still a good idea even trough I'm not in pain because I still have swelling (and to be fair sometimes even soreness) on the inside of my ankle where there's a ligament the surgeon didn't fix because he said it doesn't make a difference to people's recovery. So I did both of those things yesterday evening too.

So I'm feeling so much better now, mentally. Physically, I was totally exhausted by the longest trip out I've made since I broke my ankle (which is why this entry is going up late). Just talking to someone I don't live with felt new! It made me laugh just how much D and I were caught up in our own in-jokes and references and stuff; listening to us and imagining what we must sound like to strangers in the physio department was so funny to me. I am just not suitable for human company these days.

I came home and barely got through the rest of the work day, when it was done I immediately went to bed and slept so hard afterwards that when D woke me up to tell me dinner was ready I didn't even know where I was or what day it was.

[309/365]

Nov. 5th, 2023 07:55 pm

I broke my ankle and dislocated it. It needs surgery but that can't happen for some days yet. I finally got to go home late this evening.

gory details...mostly not gory )

I am so sympathetic to calls to pirate stuff because Netflix is bad and Amazon is bad and Disney is bad. They sure are!

But... pirated stuff never has audio description. (It's just getting around to having reliable subtitles, I guess!)

And without AD, I'm tired and I'm still left out.

I was thinking of this again today because I really would love to watch (and let my family watch!) more than one episode of Our Flag Means Death a night, but after working at a computer all day I just cannot deal with more than one episode of something that has no audio description.

Tuesday night I found myself wondering Does "casual dress code" for this work thing mean I can turn up in a hoodie and corduroys? This is how I realized that I don't actually have any work-appropriate sweaters.

Starting my transition during lockdowns and shielding, and working either from home or for other trans people, means I'm only slowly and haphazardly masculinizing my wardrobe; there are definitely still important gaps in it!

(For the record, the room the work event was in was warm enough that I didn't need a hoodie or a sweater, and wearing a t-shirt instead of a button-down shirt put me in a minority but not disastrously so.)

Walking back to the tube station after that work event, though, when I got rained on so hard it gave me a little anxiety attack (my eyes stung and hurt so much from the rain that I couldn't see at all, which is scary when out in public, never mind in a part of London I'd never been to before)... I also realized I needed a proper winter coat.

I've been wearing a Doctor Who one that I inherited from [personal profile] mother_bones, who'd been gifted if and didn't wear it. She said its like David Tennant's coat which makes sense because I'm forever getting compliments on how it looks but it's absolutely useless: it doesn't have outer pockets, it didn't even have buttons until I asked her to add some, but even then the buttonholes are in such ridiculous places so it didn't even keep me dry... I just need a new coat.

Today, I booked a trans-friendly session at a gym for tomorrow morning! I haven't been back to the gym since before the pandemic started, but before that I had gotten a lot out of going to yoga classes and swimming with friends and messing around on the gym machines without much of an idea what I was doing.

The combination of not feeling as good about swimming during covid, those friends having gotten accustomed to going swimming elsewhere without me, not being sure what happened to my gym membership, not being sure of what kind of exercise would be good for me or how to do it, feeling like the gym I went to had never been great about accessibility and now it's further away to walk to, and gender stuff have made quite the obstacle to going back to the gym. I've never been able to manage it.

But last weekend a friend said he'd been to this. A small session (good for CO2 numbers, hopefully) with a personal trainer (good for not knowing what to do, hopefully better for accessibility as well) that's only for trans people (so my boring gender thoughts about myself should be much less of a problem) seems so perfect in almost every way.

There are only two downsides: first that it is so trans-specific that I can't bring [personal profile] diffrentcolours with me as a combination carer/fellow person who has similar hurdles to exercise. But he has very kindly said he'll drive me there tomorrow anyway, as the other downside is that it's held in a part of the city that's awkward for me to get to on my own. Anyway I always prefer not going alone to someplace that's brand new anyway. And for a thing that, ridiculously, feels so momentous, it's probably also good to have him in particular with me in case of extra Feelings, because being overwhelmed never ends well for me.

Only once I'd jumped through the hoops to ask for an account, have it approved, and register for this session at the last minute did it occur to me, belatedly, that I do not have the appropriate clothes for this at all. And I don't mean appropriate in the sense of like "will I look fat in this" or "does this match." I mean I don't have any gym shorts any more and you can't go to the gym in your underwear, heh. Luckily, D has also found a few options of things he can lend me so I should be fine for tomorrow, and I guess I have to add "gym shorts" to the list of clothes that I need to buy!

This morning I emailed the artist to reply to his invitation with my apologies for not being able to make it to London for today's event for it.

His (very quick!) reply included "You have made a very important contribution to the project, and people find your story compelling."

I'm honestly shocked at that because a) I'm no artist and b) I barely remember what I said to him on the phone, haha.

Especially since this piece is partly about memory and fragmentation, it's so funny that I'm desperate to know how I contributed to it and I never will.

This evening I had a phone call with an artist who's working on an installation,

a virtual reality experience constructed from sound and image.

In undulating bubbles around an abandoned bus, visitors discover the voices of blind and partially sighted "witnesses” who share their personal experiences and truths. This is the testimony of the missing passengers, and a platform for their voices to be heard.

So my voice was recorded to be part of this. I'm not an artist so I'm excited to be Participating in an Art!

Of course the thing will be in London. But I do have to go there a couple times in October so I'm hoping one of those will line up with this because I would like to see it (or, hear it; he told me the VR setup includes sound cues as well as visual cues to lead people to the points where the snippets of recordings will be).

He asked me three questions:

  1. How would you describe the experience of being a blind or partially-sighted person? You may want to include descriptions of daily activities, or other senses, that bring your experiences to life for the listener.

  2. What is the most important piece of information that you would like to communicate to sighted people about the challenges of living in a majority sighted world?

  3. Have your dreams been affected by being a blind or partially-sighted person and, if so, in what ways? Please include any examples of dreams you remember. If you prefer, you could also talk about the way you, as a blind or partially-sighted person, imagine things.

I talked about how I'd gained sight rather than lost it, my optic nerves, what my nystagmus is like, my journey from a medical-model upbringing to discovering and embracing the social model in adulthood, and for the last question didn't talk much about how I literally dream because I don't have anything to say about that, but talked about a recurring anxiety dream I had for many years, because I think it's related to me being partially sighted.

In the dream, I'm a passenger in a car and I suddenly realize the driver has disappeared. The car is still zooming along though and I somehow manage to climb into the empty driver's seat without affecting that. Then I have to drive, or just steer really (it's definitely an automatic I'm "driving"!), speeding along freeways/motorways full of other cars. It's never a quiet road or a two-lane highway. Always a big speedy road, often in a city, often at night with the other cars just blobs of headlights and taillights.

My dream-self has knuckles that are white from how hard I'm gripping the steering wheel, and a stomach that's churning. I weave in and out around other cars in traffic, constantly certain I'm going to crash the car. But I never do.

The dream just goes on and on like this -- not getting easier but also not getting so difficult that I crash -- until I wake up.

I remember once being almost as frustrated as relieved that I was just about managing to keep the car going, because it was so stressful and scary and tiring and my only reward for "success" here was having to do more of the same terrifying task that was being somehow asked of me.

It all sounds like a really heavy-handed metaphor, but also I'm not surprised that driving a car is how my brain chose to illustrate this so many times because it does seem like a terrifying responsibility, and I'm constantly admiring of anyone who's willing to drive me anywhere.

This opportunity to contribute to the Arts had caught my eye because of the mention of public transport in the title; I always look out for stuff like that, since it can be relevant to my job at times. But here, there was no other mention of it. The questions weren't about that at all, as you can see, which I think is interesting. Fair enough that what is going on inside strangers' heads on a bus might have little or nothing to do with the bus at all.

Or anywhere: I remember distinctly having this revelation when I was a kid: in a car on a freeway as it happens, but this was being safely driven by my dad. I was in the backseat, and I cannot remember if we were going out or coming back home, but I was either excited about or basking in whatever we'd done on that particular trip (Twins game, Disney on Ice, something like that). I remember looking at other cars in the next lane, especially when traffic was slow enough that I could see inside them. Other kids, their strange blankets and toys cluttering up their own backseats, unknown adults driving, often I couldn't see anything inside the car and only knew if it was blue or red, big or little, going the same or opposite direction...

Suddenly I realized the people in all those cars didn't know we'd just been to Disney on Ice or were excited about the upcoming Twins game or whatever, and that meant I also didn't know where they were going or why. Were they on longer or shorter trips than us? Was it fun like this or scary like when I had to go to hospitals? I had no idea. It was dizzying, how little I knew. And I would never know. There was no way to know.

I spent a lot of car journeys after that making up stories about the people in the other cars we went past.

Anyway, back to tonight! The artist seemed happy with my answers, I have no idea what he'll make of them and I'm terribly interested to find out.

I finally did a personal response for the awful plan to stop staffing almost all ticket offices in England (and one in Glasgow. Link is to advice on what to write, since of course there's no questions in this consultation and there are two separate bodies you have to respond to depending on whether you're talking about stations in London or not in London, with no clear definition of what "London" is for these purposes...

The government and the rail industry have sure made this consultation unusually complex and confusing to engage with! It's almost like they don't want anyone to respond!

I'm sure glad that such a ludicrous notion could never be the case, because they would be disappointed with the response if they did -- I don't have exact numbers, but I've heard 460,000, and maybe as much as half a million, for the number of responses received as of a day or two ago. All this in a consultation that, even having been extended, is about two-thirds of the length that the delightfully-named Gunning Principles would suggest for a consultation with such drastic impact.

I finished our organisational response at work today and sent that in. And of course my own overlapped with that a lot -- I know the stats by heart of course -- but I also got to say some different things. I put one of the most important points at the end, for rhetorical impact, which I also wouldn't be allowed to do at work, heh:

Among my first thoughts when I heard about this consultation is how are blind people going to know that the stranger on a platform or concourse who tells us they're a member of staff actually is one, and not a member of the public who reckons we're vulnerable people they can exploit? None of the TOCs' [train operating companies] proposals address this anywhere! I imagine they haven't considered this problem at all -- with three-quarters of working-age visually impaired people unemployed, that means most lines of work are missing out on our perspective and train operators don't seem to be any exception.

One of the main benefits of ticket offices is that they're a fixed location -- I can learn the route to the ticket offices in familiar stations, and I can ask the way to the ticket office in unfamiliar stations -- and only staff can get inside them! So I know where to go if I need anything, and I know I'm speaking to someone trustworthy.

I don't think sighted people appreciate how, when you're handing over cash or your bank card, or when you're asking for sighted guidance -- i.e. to be led around by holding on to a stranger -- you can feel so vulnerable! It is inhumane to take away the trust and confidence we can currently have in staff at a ticket office, only to replace it with stress and a world that's more hostile to us.

[222/365]

Aug. 10th, 2023 09:14 pm

I've just done an interview for someone researching isolation, loneliness and mental health in visually impaired people. It's a topic very near to my heart and hey I love an excuse to talk about myself.

Made me laugh that the interviewer said in his last email "I've put the Teams call in for an hour and a half but don't worry, it's unlikely to take longer than an hour" and then we finally hung up after almost two hours.

I've thought about this stuff a lot!  And I do like to talk about myself!

Always a good sign when your boyfriend is like "do you want to add this to the list of things you're complaining to Northern about?" when it's not even 10am and you're still in Manchester.

I was so angry I would've done some shouting if there had been time. But there wasn't. That was part of the problem...

So: this morning D and I were traveling to Bournemouth. For a few days, so we've got luggage. We're tired. I'm already incredibly uncomfortably because it's that kind of weather where you get rained on and you get sweaty. We found somewhere quiet and ventilated (thus, blessedly cool) enough to take our masks off and put down the bags.

D hasn't had breakfast, and we'll need lunch on the train. He offers to go to a shop in the station, I can wait with the stuff so we don't have to drag everything with us. Good plan!

D comes back way too soon. He says "they won't let me through without your railcard."

I was immediately livid.

To get off the platforms and on to the station, he had to have his ticket checked. It says it's connected to a Disabled Person's Railcard because those entitle the disabled person to a companion at the same reduced fare. Staff on the train regularly ask to see the railcard when they check the tickets and they are perfectly entitled to do so.

But it never happens on the platform. I have never in many years of using one been asked to show my railcard while I'm trying to get to or from the platform in a train station (and I don't always use my cane so I'm not always visibly disabled). It would be a huge burden to do so at the very least (it's very difficult to faff with fiddly things like wallets/bags/phone when one hand is taken up with your cane! I have to stop walking to use my phone, put a mask on/take it off, do anything that requires my hands). And it's no exaggeration to say that a demand to see my railcard in this context could be a hazard at busy times when the area might be crowded and people might be in a rush behind you.

Railcards are offered in digital form as well as a physical card these days. Because when I renewed mine I needed it in a hurry, I had to get the digital one which is just an app on your phone that shows a QR code. So for D to show my railcard, I'd have to give him my phone. I trust him with it, but that would leave me without it if one of us needed to contact the other. We had a tight schedule for getting food and making it to our train, anything going wrong in the next 15 minutes would wreck a whole day's travel and set me up badly for my early start tomorrow at this work-related conference I'm here for. I really didn't want to give up my phone, my connection to the world, at such a time.

Another thing that made me mad was how arbitrary this is. If D had tried to get through to the concourse via one of the platforms that has automated ticket barriers, the railcard couldn't have been checked. He'd clearly come off a train to be coming from the platforms, so the job of checking the railcard was the responsibility of train staff, not this random person on the platform.

All this flashed through my head in a millisecond and I was angry. I jumped up and we both, with all the bags, went all the way down to the ticket checkers. D aimed for the same one as last time. When he showed her his ticket she looked at us both like she was losing control of this situation and said "which of you has the railcard?"

"I do," I said, glaring. I hadn't even been able to get my ticket out, it was tucked away deep in my wallet deep in a pocket and I now had to hold my white cane in one hand and pull my wheelie suitcase with the other.

She didn't challenge me, didn't say another word to us but just turned to other people. It was kinda crowded. She didn't really need to see my railcard. She saw a visible sign of my disability and decided to let it go. It makes me so mad because there are so many disabilities that don't come with such inarguable evidence as a white cane. Most people with sight loss don't even have one! So many disabilities are invisible. Clearly she only challenged D because he "didn't look disabled." And that's not on.

Not only is anyone totally capable of having an invisible disability, it's also totally valid to have the disabled person's companion go do chores like this while the disabled person rests! That's precisely the kind of situation where I really benefit from a companion traveling with me! It's a potential downside of the digital railcard that I can't give it to said companion without losing access to my whole phone (and without them needing my password etc. to unlock the phone, which would be a faff to teach them in a time-sensitive situation like this even if that was something I wanted to do). But it's all the more reason for station staff not to challenge people when they're just trying to buy food and get back on another train.

They should be able to trust their fellow staff on the inbound train. I don't understand what this adds to any "revenue protection" or whatever justification she would've had. I'm worried the justification would have been a cover for the real motivation: the pernicious worry in this country that someone, somewhere, might have something they don't "deserve."

The other day, [personal profile] diffrentcolours spotted something happening as part of the Manchester International Festival that he thought might be relevant to us: a stage show called The Faggots and Their Friends Between the Revolutions.

Described by Artforum as a "fairytale-cum-manifesto", The Faggots & Their Friends Between Revolutions is a series of allegorical vignettes set in the declining empire of Ramrod, ruled by "the men" (patriarchal society) under the rule of Warren-And-His-Fuckpole, while the eponymous "faggots" (gay men) live communally, produce art, have sex, and await the next revolution. Their "friends" include the "strong women" (feminists), the "queens" (drag queens), the "women who love women" (lesbians), and the "faeries" (the Radical Faeries), among others. Distinct from the faggots are the "queer men" – gay men who are closeted, or who have assimilated into patriarchal society. The novel is primarily non-narrative, and is composed largely of a combination of single-page episodes, polemic writing, and aphorisms.

I was surprised because I'd only heard the words of this title in this order a few days earlier: a friend who works in a library in another country said he wasn't content with having read this book from there and now wants his own copy. This was enough to be intriguing, and I was also keen to finally go to an audio-described live performance, so he and I got tickets and went this afternoon (sadly [personal profile] mother_bones wasn't well enough to join us).

It was amazing.

I wasn't expecting it to be so musical! It was through-composed -- everything was sung (in a very 20th-century style, and the queer politics felt very 20th-century to me too), and not fitting the patterns of melody or chord progressions in the sense that such things are typically understood by people who listen to pop or blues or showtunes or whatever.

It leaves you -- well, me anyway -- without specific musical memories: no tunes you're humming or earworms stuck in your head, just more nebulous feelings. D said it felt "joyous, liberating, magickal and interactive, we all got to have a sing song."

I don't know if the interactive part was specific to this performance, because one of the cast members who told us about the rules of this relaxed performance told us she'd check on us halfway through (there was no intermission), when she did so told us we should learn the song. Even as we were learning it, it was difficult to keep track of the melody and timing of the words. Even as she was teaching it, she forgot a line or two in the middle.

One of the most delightful things for me about the whole performance was that I could hear the person doing the audio description say "I think she has missed a line" in confirmation after the performer said "uh, I think I forgot a line when I was teaching you this song..." Also I could occasionally hear bits of the audio description person singing along with the rest of us. I loved that.

The many performers sang and danced and played an impressive array of instruments: not just hints like violin and flute and piano but harpsichord and viola de gamba. This musical diversity was matched by other kinds of visible diversity in race and gender presentations (including fabulous costume changes).

We chose this over yesterday's performance because today had audio description. For which I was incredibly grateful because I would've missed so much without it that I wouldn't have had nearly as good a time. It was my first time experiencing audio description at a live event, and I was really curious to see how it worked. A similar experience to the cinema (a wireless headset that's picky about where you sit/how you move your head sometimes) but of course different in other ways: the description has to be done live too, it's not just another audio track like on a movie. The description still fit around the "dialogue" as much as possible as it would in a movie or TV show.

Not that this was a play with dialogue in the usual sense: there weren't characters coming and going and speaking to each other etc. They were more like epic poets, telling us stories, and they were their own Greek chorus too. As well as their own pit orchestra like I've described, and their own choreographed dance troupe.

D and I talked afterward about how the casting must have been very stringent in some ways -- big demands on everyone for singing, dance/movement, playing instruments, etc. -- but could also be very flexible in others: the performers could be of any age, ethnicity, gender, appearance... Indeed there didn't even seem to need to be this particular number of them: you'd want a biggish group but it could easily vary by 5 or 10 and still convey a similarly meaningful performance.

Yet everyone's individuality did matter: Yandas* was a strong and captivating physical presence so she moved around a lot, Dipa* was an operatic singer so used her voice to stunning effect especially when singing words like "faggot" or "fuck" which made people laugh because we aren't used to words like that sounding like they're in an opera. (I understand that opera, like Shakespeare, was popular entertainment in its day, and just treated like impossibly highbrow and inaccessible now, so I thought it was totally appropriate to hear such words given such treatment.)

It was great and I wish more of you could see it. I think a lot of you would like it, but also I just want more people to talk about it with!


*I'm guessing at how these names are spelled by the way; I only heard them in the audio description. It was never even clear to me if they were character names at all, or perhaps the performers' names, because there weren't really characters here. (The flautist was called Eric, and every time the describer said his name I jumped a little, as if I'd been called on in a meeting and wasn't prepared.)

[162/365]

Jun. 12th, 2023 11:55 pm

When I woke up this morning (about 4:30, as is becoming my usual, ugh) I found myself gently pondering what kind of day it would be. Normally I'd look at my Monday meetings on Sunday night to remind/prepare myself, but I had been way too tired the previous night.

My idle pondering of my schedule suddenly turned into a sharp pain. Wait a minute. If it was Monday...wasn't I going to London?!

I was! Despite many travel-related hardships, apparently! )

So that's my day of going to a meeting to talk about how blind and partially sighted people are more disrupted and stressed by public transport delays and cancelations than sighted people are.

I have noted the irony.

But with no surprise. Something like this happens every time I travel for work; I could always be my own case study.

Thanks to [personal profile] andrewducker for the link to someone talking about how they accidentally encountered audio description and loved it.

I watched dungeons and dragons this evening. I tried to turn on subtitles. I went into the settings, and, thinking I was turning on subtitles, turned on the descriptive audio for blind people.

I didn’t realize I’d done it, I assumed the movie was narrated, like a dungeon master describing what was going on...

I watched that whole movie with the visual description audio track.I grew to love the narration. I kept thinking that the movie had great visuals, but the narration added a different element and made really good use of the dialogue breaks in the action scenes.

I swear to god, sometimes the narrator would describe things a few seconds before or after they visually occurred on screen and I was consciously trying to analyze it from a storytelling perspective and determine why they described some things in advance and some things after they’d already happened.

Eventually when there's no credit for the voice actor at the end of the movie (though usually before the credits, the audio describer says "Audio description provided by [company]. Script written by X and read by Y [though sometimes X and Y are the same person]"...I suppose this person wasn't *listening for credits or explanations though, and might not have recognized this for what it was, if it's their first encounter with audio description!), this person realizes what has happened: what they've heard isn't an inherent part of the movie, but the audio description track. So they experiment with watching the movie as it is intended for sighted people.

I turned off the descriptive track and watched a bit, I was really disappointed. It’s still a good movie, but the narration made it so much better.

If you liked the movie and we’re planning a rewatch, or if you are watching it for the first time, consider turning on the audio description. I really believe it made the movie better.

It's a fun example of the curb-cut effect. I'm forever recommending audio description to sighted people: people who like to knit or do other things when they're watching TV so they're not always watching, people who aren't good at keeping track of which character is which, even just people who think that movies are too damn dark and hard to see these days.

But it's interesting to see someone benefiting from this without even realizing.

I suppose that could be interpreted as a success. Not only did the audio description fit into the pauses between dialogue and other important sounds (something it always has to do), not only did this person notice and expect meaning in the way that sometimes the description would be just before or just after something happened on the screen (which again is just a necessity of fitting in words around actions that might be quicker to do than to explain, as well as the aforementioned need to fit around the regular audio track), but these things that I recognize as just emergent properties of the genre of audio description felt impressive and meaningful to someone new to this, who didn't even know they were partaking in this art form that's adjacent to visual media.

It also benefited from the genre (lots of storytelling-within-a-story tropes in fantasy) and the specific case of being a movie about a role-playing system that does feature someone running the game and telling the story to the players.

It probably also helps that it was Sue Perkins specifically, who was great, and that she did the AD in a particularly engaged way, with a few little jokes and letting her voice take on noticeable emotion in response to the events she was describing. Even summarizing the dialogue rather than reading it all out might have contributed to the impressed that this was a narrator/DM, someone who was part of the story.

I don't think it's bad for audio description to stick out, to be obviously different from a regular movie. But I never expected it to blend in this well -- that isn't really a goal of its -- so it was surprising and endearing to see that happen.

Profile

the cosmolinguist

August 2025

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags