the cosmolinguist ([personal profile] cosmolinguist) wrote2013-09-04 06:44 pm
Entry tags:

Hollie

I can understand belief in gods, the subjectivity of attraction, the apppeal of stuff I don't like. I understand the influence the yogh has had on English orthography and I understand why atonal music makes people feel unsettled. I even understood once, for a whole afternoon, Cantor's Diagonal Proof.

But I cannot understand how often e-mails from me, with my name in the "from" field and my name at the bottom of the e-mail (and, in many cases, my name in the e-mail address itself) elicit replies addressed to "Hollie." Once or twice I could forgive. Even from someone who's known me for years -- because that person regularly called Jennie "Jenny" too. But this is happening a lot. From different people. Who often get it right at first or in between instances of wrongness, so it's not as if they're hopeless causes.

I can't even tell if I really hate the -ie spelling of my name for itself (but I think I do, ugh) or if I just hate the lack of attention it represents.

[identity profile] land-girl.livejournal.com 2013-09-04 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
It's bizarre. Perhaps some people don't see everything when they read?
taimatsu: (yomikoface)

[personal profile] taimatsu 2013-09-08 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
My workplace lists internal email addresses in Outlook surname first, so I am Kennedy Lucy TEAM NAME. This sucks for people whose surname is a common first name, e.g. Graham or James. We had a series of complaints on the internal letters page about this a while back, and proposals to form a club of people misnamed all the time.

I'm now checking email for a colleague who has moved to a different role, who keeps getting addressed as Mark although his surname is actually Marks and his first name is entirely different. It's not like people don't KNOW the surname is listed first! I do think people don't read properly a lot of the time.